Announcing: ZFS-fuse 0.7.0
#14 — mountpoints in /etc/mtab should list file system as "fuse#zfs" not just "fuse"
| State | Resolved |
|---|---|
| Version: | 0.6.0 |
| Area | Functionality |
| Issue type | Bug |
| Severity | Medium |
| Submitted by | Uwe Kubosch |
| Submitted on | Dec 30, 2009 |
| Responsible | Seth Heeren |
| Target release: | 0.7.0 |
Last modified on
Sep 19, 2010
by
Seth Heeren
This will enable targeted umount.
Added by
Seth Heeren
on
Dec 30, 2009 09:15 PM
Issue state:
unconfirmed → open
Responsible manager:
(UNASSIGNED) → RuddO
+1
note however, that this change will likely break existing setups for users that apply legacy mount points (fstab style).
I've personally not used it, and perhaps it is impossible because of this very naming issue. I'll list an example of a sshfs (fuse) mountpoint for reference:
sshfs#root@server:/ /server fuse comment=sshfs,noauto,users,allow_other,gid=1000,uid=1000,transform_symlinks 0 0
note however, that this change will likely break existing setups for users that apply legacy mount points (fstab style).
I've personally not used it, and perhaps it is impossible because of this very naming issue. I'll list an example of a sshfs (fuse) mountpoint for reference:
sshfs#root@server:/ /server fuse comment=sshfs,noauto,users,allow_other,gid=1000,uid=1000,transform_symlinks 0 0
Added by
Rudd-O
on
Dec 30, 2009 11:43 PM
It won't break anything -- the formal way to specify in FSTAB is actually fuse#fsname. Check the fuse manpage.
Added by
User Group
on
Dec 31, 2009 05:21 AM
Erm, thanks for that useful info.
Although I'm not all convinced why this guarantees nobody's setup will be broken?
Mine would have, had I used my (uncanonical?) syntax.
Perhaps you wanted to say: I don't care if this breaks setups that use unsupported fstab syntax.
Although I'm not all convinced why this guarantees nobody's setup will be broken?
Mine would have, had I used my (uncanonical?) syntax.
Perhaps you wanted to say: I don't care if this breaks setups that use unsupported fstab syntax.
Added by
(anonymous)
on
Apr 10, 2010 05:23 AM
Hello Seth
It would be nice to have it displayed same as encfs fuse in mtab: "fuse.zfs" - Like this it is possible to add zfs-fuse to PRUNEFS in /etc/updatedb.conf selectively if you don't want a zfs filesysten to be indexed by mlocate.
It would be nice to have it displayed same as encfs fuse in mtab: "fuse.zfs" - Like this it is possible to add zfs-fuse to PRUNEFS in /etc/updatedb.conf selectively if you don't want a zfs filesysten to be indexed by mlocate.
Added by
Seth Heeren
on
May 28, 2010 07:18 PM
Will address in 0.7.0
Added by
Seth Heeren
on
Sep 19, 2010 05:28 PM
Issue state:
open → resolved
Target release:
None → 0.7.0
Responsible manager:
RuddO → sgheeren
implemented in testing (1b0f8651092e)
